Nonduality (/\)
Archive 4
Archive Home
March 1, 2000: A
Request from Mr. Chopra
March 2, 2000: Siva's Perfect
Universe, by M
March 3, 2000: tHe kiD:
when? does the dream begin, by gEn beRLin
March 4, 2000: Little notes about
K from garbage pile, by O.H.
March 5, 2000: Arisings as an
Interplay of Idea-stuff, by Greg Goode
March 6, 2000: HAHAHAH HA AND
HOHOHOHO, by Michael Read
March 7, 2000: Compressed
Information of Wound, Informs, Guides and Shapes Our
World, by Gene Poole
March 8, 2000: Collapsing the
Dualistic Paradigm, by Bruce Morgen
March 10, 2000: I have but one
mission in life and that is to finish this sentence, by
Rik Wallace
March 11, 2000: Mexico City
Blues, by Jack Kerouac
March 12, 2000: Poem, by David
Hodges
March 13, 2000: Force, Power, and
Live Energy, by Andrew Macnab and Gene Poole
March 14, 2000: The Window
Shopping for Guru is Done, by Alan Kuntz
March 15, 2000: Forecast of a
Rebellion, by W. David Kubiak
March 16, 2000: In America, the
teacher gets blamed for everything wrong, by Henry, et
al.
March 17, 2000: The Experience of
No-Self: A Contemplative Journey, by Bernadette Roberts
March 18, 2000: Halfway up the
Mountain - The Error of Premature Claims to
Enlightenment, by Mariana Caplan
March 19, 2000: Karma, Fate and
World Process, by M
March 20, 2000: Grace, Grit and
Laughter, by Alan Kuntz
March
1
A Request
from Mr. Chopra
Deepak Chopra
John Metzger submitted the following to the Allspirit list:
Deepak
Chopra was recently interviewed by Katie Couric on the
Today Show. In all their wisdom, the producers chose not
to air the segment in favor of a piece on the marry a
millionaire scandal.
Deepak posted this on his website and is asking for your
support to get the segement aired.
Read on...
Dear Friend,
I want to share with you a very interesting episode that
has been unfolding over the past few days. It provides us
a clue on how to use the seven biological responses
explored in my new book, How To Know God. I had been
scheduled to promote the book on the NBC Today Show for
the past six months. I took a plane early this week from
California to New York City, but my live appearance was
bumped by the story of the man who had failed to reveal a
restraining order before appearing on the show, Who wants
to marry a millionaire? Consequently, I taped the show to
be aired the next day. The interview went very well with
Katie Couric, but later that evening the producer decided
the interview was "too cerebral, too advanced,"
and unsuitable for their audience.
I spoke directly to one of the producers and asked her if
she felt their audience was not bright enough to
understand the material in the book and she responded,
"maybe so." Although I suggested that they were
underestimating the intelligence of their audience, they
continue to maintain their position to not air the
interview. This circumstance provided me with a great
opportunity to explore the seven biological responses.
I'd like to share with you my experience as an example of
how we can deal with life's inevitable challenges.
My first response was obviously the fight/flight
response.
I was irritable and wanted to argue and confront them. I
held them responsible for this upset and was angry with
them for not fulfilling their obligation. I quickly moved
into a reactive response with my ego wanting to assert
control and seeking to demonstrate how they were wrong
and I was right. I stayed in the reactive response all
evening, even encouraging my audiences to call the Today
Show and request that the interview be aired.
The next morning I woke up, went into meditation and
experienced the restful awareness response. I was able to
step out of my conditioned patterns and see the world
with new eyes. In this state of centered awareness, I was
able to move into the intuitive response and ask myself,
what was the deeper significance of this episode? The
answer was immediate and obvious: the mainstream media is
stuck in an old paradigm while the world is moving into a
new one. I asked, how can we create something that has
never been done before by eliciting the creative
response? It became obvious that our new company,
MyPotential is being formed to develop a multi-media
approach that will nurture people in an evolutionary
matter that acknowledges and supports their relationship
with the larger web of life.
The visionary response then actualized as a result of the
question: if we created such a company what would happen?
It became obvious to me that if we could reach critical
mass with a nurturing and evolutionary message, the world
would never be the same. We could heal the wounds of our
planet as expressed by the current media, which gives
prime attention to a man accused of battering his former
girlfriend just because he is a millionaire. We clearly
need to raise the consciousness of our planet and use
this episode as an opportunity to inspire us to a higher
vision.
Finally, I had a taste of the sacred response through the
experience of reverence and gratitude for a God that
makes things happen just as they are supposed to and for
providing me the opportunity to witness how my reality
changes in different states of awareness. I felt love and
appreciation for everyone engaged in this little drama.
This has been my experience and I am writing this letter
as a learning exercise. I invite everyone who is reading
this letter to join this conversation. Identify an
incident in your life that is challenging you right now
and see if you can look at it from these seven responses.
If you have any experiences you would like to share, you
can do so at our howtoknowgod.com message board. A simple
way to identify which response is predominant at any time
is to ask yourself the following questions:
1st response: Am I running or fighting?
2nd response: Am I offended?
3rd response: Am I centered?
4th response: What is the deeper significance of this
situation?
5th response: What can I create that never existed
before?
6th response: How does this affect my relationship with
the larger web of life and transform me and all those
affected by my choices?
In such a situation what would Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed,
Laotsu, Moses, or any other great heroic or archetypal
figure that you admire do?
7th response: Does experience bring me a sense of awe,
reverence for the sacred, connection with divine
intelligence and love for all sentient beings?
If you would still like to view my interview on the Today
Show, feel free to call NBC @ (212) 664-4249 or email
them @ today@nbc.com, politely requesting them to air the
interview and suggesting that there are many intelligent
people who understand and appreciate topics of
importance.
Finally, together we can use our daily challenges to
begin a profound transformation in our lives and the
lives of everyone that we love.
Love,
Deepak
March
2
Siva's Perfect
Universe
by M
This originally appeared on the Bhairava list
Slowly,
slowly, by performing Ganga Sadhana you will blend your
external consciousness with our most perfect universal
consciousness. While sitting by the river, close enough
to touch the water, on a rock or tree limb, you are truly
uninvolved with everything but yourself. You are now in
tune with nature itself. Earth is there. Water is there.
Fire is there. Air is there. Akasha is there. All the
five elements are there. They are outside of you to see
and feel, as well as inside of you to see and feel. The
goal is to release that part of your subconscious mind
that doesn't blend the within of you with that which is
outside of you. You perform this blending by listening to
the river murmur, "Aum Namah Shivaya, Shivaya Namah
Aum," the sounds of Shiva's perfect universe.
Now the challenge. This will not be an easy task. The
quiet of the noise of nature will release thought after
thought from your subconscious mind. So, when each new
thought arises--a mental argument or something which has
not been settled in your past, an appointment missed or
an image of a loved one--gather up the pranic energy of
the thought and put its vibrations into a leaf. To do
this, hold the leaf in your right hand and project your
prana into it along with thought. Then take the leaf into
your two hands and release it with the thought patterns
into the river. Let the river take them away, while
listening to "Aum Namah Shivaya, Shivaya Namah
Aum" of the river as it does. Each time this
happens, thank the river by humbly offering into it a
flower. To show appreciation is a quality of the soul,
something not to be ignored, and, therefore, a vital part
of this sadhana.
Sadhana is performing the same discipline over and over
and over again. Just as we methodically exercise the
physical body to build up its muscles, we perform
spiritual disciplines over and over again to strengthen
our spiritual, inner bodies. Perform Ganga Sadhana time
and time again. You will rapidly advance. Remember, the
outer river is symbolically representing the inner river
of your own nerve system, life force and consciousness
that flows through you night and day. So, even as you sit
on this rock and look upon the water, in a mystical way,
see it as your own superconscious energies taking away
these problems, worries, doubts, ill-conceived and
unresolved experiences of the past. Flow with the river
of life and merge in Shiva's ocean of oneness.
March
4
little notes about K
from garbage pile
by O.H.
~~Yep,
Kundalini rises in 3 nadis (subtle threads) up the spine
area (not the actual spine - well, i know you know that,
but just in case) Bigee in the middle, two less bigee's
on either side (Sushumna, Ida and Pigala).
But, these are not the only nadis K "uses" -
there are over 70,000 nadis throughout the body through
which K has a jolly good time cleaning out ego gook (and
of course, chakras have biggest piles.).
That is why each person's K experiences are different,
because the flavor of the experience depends on what
personal gook is being cleaned out. One may have visions,
one may jump like a frog - this is not surprising however
when one is small and green, one may see lights, one may
feel depressed, and so on. These are just manifestations
of the blockages in the nadis (and chakras) that dear K
is working on.
~~K also "descends" - teachers and K
experiencers have described the rising (from the base of
spine) "and" the descending (from crown area)
of K. "Descending as a shower" is a common
expression.
K will go up and fool around with lover (Shiva) but not
"do" it many times (then she goes back down and
rises again - the tease!) "Having drunk, having
drunk, having again drunk," (Tantra), or she will
whisper sweet nothings "I'm comin' darlin'" and
this foreplay touches the pleasure buttons in our brains.
We have an "experience" of insight, bliss, a
glimpse of non-duality, and we think "Wow! i am
realized!!
Better run and post on the NDS list."
But these "enightenments" will happen often
before the big O, best to not take them so seriously,
putting ego labels on them and all - maybe just sit back
and enjoy. Besides, K not too happy with kinky
threesomes, and has to go work then on getting rid of
"I am realized" blockage in Nadi #53,467 -
takes more time then 'til Precious Union.
"I was swept up to Thee by Thy beauty, and torn away
from Thee by my own weight." St. Augustine
~~Don't think there could be more than one "life
force," eh? K, chi, whatever, perhaps they are all
the same energy, just different traditions naming them
and working with them. Perhaps there is life force and it
is called chi or it is called K or it is called Great
Kangaroo - this is not surprising when one is large and
brown, but when it is "awakened" to an
intensity that begins to clean out all the chakras/nadis
(beyond our control), than it is more commonly called K
as in a Kundalini Awakening. However, some traditions
"do" mention the Great Kangaroo awakening -
there you go.
K has been described (Avalon's Serpent Power) as having
two forms of energy at the same time: static (coiled
potential energy at the base of spine), and dynamic
(providing life's forces.) The energy expended in the
life's forces does not take away energy from the coiled
serpent - H.H. the Great Pair o' Docs.
"The whole is subtracted from the whole and yet the
whole remains." (Upanishad).
When she's awakened, K as the life force is still doing
her thing (albeit diminished proportionally as the
lovemaking gets heated up), but the driving force is to
unite with Her Lover above the crown (at that point life
force is diminished so much body becomes very cold,
corpse-like.).
"With his gentle hand he wounded my neck, And caused
all my senses to be suspended."
~~When a being has their K running around very strongly
or she's already up there smoking a cigarette, you touch
their hand or even just get near them, or touch something
they have touched, or look into their eyes, or see their
picture, or even read their words on the net! (yep,
happens a lot) your own K is aroused (In some people gets
aroused very easily - horny little dickens.)
"I was as if the fire in the tree burned the tree as
if the sweet smells of the winds of space took over the
nostrils as if the doll of wax went up in flames. I saw
Her Eyes and lost the world." Prabhu
~~Even though we may feel like it is coming from
"outside," the only K we "feel" is
inside us. Course it doesn't belong to us - formless,
changeless, no boundaries/limitations, but you know all
that stuff.
"The Spirit is playing, The Spirit is longing, The
Spirit with fancy creating all, Surrenders himself to the
bliss of love..Amid the flowers of His creation, He
lingers in a kiss.. Blinded by their beauty, He rushes,
He frolics, He dances, He whirls, He is all rapture, all
bliss, in this play Free, Divine, in this love
struggle."
Skryabin
Well, that's all - just some notes about K from garbage
pile (maybe right, maybe wrong, maybe up, maybe down,
maybe only H.H. the Great Jumper knows for sure) to do
with what thou wilt.
love you all, oh
"I remained, lost in oblivion; My face I reclined on
the Beloved. All ceased and I abandoned myself, Leaving
my cares forgotten among the lilies." St.John
March 5
Arisings as
an Interplay of Idea-stuff
Greg Goode, Ph.D., with Manchine
Greg: So -- sensory modalities, biology, physics, thoughts, information, external objects, all that stuff. We do science with it. But how can any of it be any more or less real than any of the rest?
Manchine: It's all real, although within a limited perception, and I can't stress the vital importance of that simple statement. If you see that the physical is false, you are perhaps loosing the most important clue as to what it is there for, as to why we are. So what is spiritual quest? The search of tranquility by ignoring? Don't think so.
Greg: You make a good point - there are perceptions that take all this stuff as real. And it can be the ultimate cop-out, putting one's head in the sand, to blithely say none of it's real. Often this is accompanied by self-indulgent or hurtful behavior. I'm sorry if I gave you this kind of impression, I don't want to. This was a kind of metaphysical topic with Roger, not everyday talk. I was using the "real/unreal" distinction the way they do in advaita vedanta - real is said to be permanent and independent; unreal is said to be transitory and dependent on something else. The purpose of our being here? How's this -- to find the Self, which is Love, and then to celebrate and love each other and all things as instances of that Self.
"The physical as false?" Funny you should mention that. I'll tell you a story about something that happened to me. In my case, the beliefs and experiences related to the physical realm fell away about 18 years ago, long before I knew anything about spiritual or mystical life. In the early 80's, I took a graduate seminar in George Berkeley. He's the guy who argued persuasively against the external, independent existence of physical objects. The popular tagline about Berkeley is this -- he's the guy who said that if a tree in the forest falls and there's no one to hear it, it doesn't make a sound. Our professor was a world-class Berkeley scholar and not a fair grader -- to get a good grade in the seminar, we had to write papers only in favor of Berkeley!! And his arguments were not what I'd call intuitive (though he is one of the most engaging philosophical stylists in the English language).
So we read and read and read. Long story short, there was a transformational point where physical objects lost once and for all their sense of externality and reality and heaviness and solidity. Including my own body. In 18 years or so, objects have never regained these qualities for me. Objects seemed and felt like they were made fully and completely of idea-stuff, appearances to mind, and not separate from me. (Back then I thought I *was* the mind.) I would ride a bike or learn to rollerblade in the city, lift weights, do bodybuilding. Yes I would avoid cars and trucks, and set the barbells down carefully. But there was no real separation between my body and other objects. Physical actions now had the feeling of lightness and clarity and insubstantiality of ideas. This includes physical pain, illness, injury, all of which stopped feeling like they were happening to me or my body, but rather just arising as an interplay of idea-stuff.
Now non-dualism has some *intellectual* teachings on this, but no way for it to work into experience unless a large enough "Shift Happens." A few years ago I was delighted and intrigued to encounter a Kashmir Shaivist form of yoga which cultivates the same kind of experience of the world.
March 6
HAHAHAH HAH
and HOHOHOHO
by Michael
Read
Here I sit in the wastelands of Portland feeling like a lone little non-dualist. Thinking about going to the Living Enrichment Center 11 am services. Thinking about not going to the services.
They talk about god there. The basic premise is that all 6 billion people on the planet are just manifestations of god. The vibration however, is separate. God is other, still, somehow. I sense this basic feeling of separateness in the good people worshipping there. As most of them come from the various christian sects - this makes sense.
As for me - HAHAHAH H and HOHOHO! I no longer believe in god. Jesus is/was not a saviour/messiah and buddha is/was not a lord. There is no thing that is divine or holy. There is no thing that is evil or corrupt. All is one. ALL IS BEAUTY.
I am starting to realize that what we call god is merely a manifestation of mind. Samhadi is an emotional state brought on by meditation, happenstance, drugs, fasting or luck :-)- nothing more. Oh yes I experience the bliss. Somehow it does not seem like an end, more it seems like a means to something else.
Me at the age of 15 staying up all night asking the universe (called it god then) why, Why, WHY! Why does anything exist at all? The answer was music and bliss flowing through me! :-) Driving along and hearing a voice telling me to 'be out of your body now' and exiting out of the top of my head, growing to about 50 feet tall. Realizing that I was not behind the wheel Reaching down to guide the car around the corner like it was a toy. Hearing the voice say, 'not bad, ok you can go back into your body now.'
Me as a youngster of 20 something. Having dreams and visions - questing after the answer. Going to India to see the guru maharaji - self proclaimed lord of the universe - now just another 'divine' con artist.
Ah India! Powers manifesting in me. Miracles abounding. More on this another time! HAHAHAH H and HOHOHOHO!
Me as a 50 something. Last year - mother dying - dead in April. Joining a chi kung study group with my best friend in May/June. Leaving that mini-cult in December! [-) Losing my friendship. Gaining my senses back.
Seeking to know the ANSWER like my hair was on fire! Awakening! :-)Hearing voices and seeing visions. Knowing oneness, seeing duality!
Awakening! Like a chick out of its shell. Like a tadpole dreaming. Like a caterpillar eating. What is next?
So. Does anybody know of any non-dualist realizer satsangers here in the greater Portland, OR area? I sure could use some company! :-)
HAHAHAH HAH and HOHOHOHO!
Peace - Michael ********************************* neo responded: I no longer believe in god. As a quote from "City of Angels": "Some things are true if you believe in them or not." All Love, neo
********************************* I responded to neo!
What is it then, neo? Allah Allah Akbhar? Yahweh? Krsna? Jesu Christu? We have to leave buddhism out. That path is the great athiestic realization of oneness! Gautama replied that there is no soul, no atman.
To imply a soul is to imply separation. ;-)
But is buddhism the answer? I dearly love the image of the laughing buddha!
Perhaps god is like that capricious character on 'Star Trek'. You know the one - Q! Entire realities altered/created/destroyed with but the snap of a finger!
Perhaps god is like stodgy old YHWH. Stumping around mountain tops carving the law on stone, burning bushes and riding about on pillars of fire. All the while dreaming up contracts for the chosen.
Perhaps god is like Krishna. Our best friend who urges us onward. Live life with gusto, honor and determination. Fight the good fight and let Me sort out the rest.
Perhaps god is the standing wave that all of creation rests upon. That would be rather like the great turtle of some native American cultures.
No, neo, I no longer believe in god. To believe in god I have to see myself as separate from god. There is no god because god is everywhere. This is so beyond my understanding that I understand it completely! lazy 8 (where is that pesky infinity sign?)
What was that voice that directed me out of my body? What was that power that moved the car? What is that who dares to say I AM THAT?
What to do what to do! Enjoy! HAHAHAH HAH and HOHOHOHO
March 7
Compressed Information of
Wound, Informs, Guides and Shapes Our World
by Gene Poole, with Marcia Paul and Xan
Gene: There is a way to understand what is going on with this question that you are dealing with, to wit: Thought, content, thought-form, core wound, and what is 'really going on' on a level of phenomenology. See below:
Marcia: Perhaps a thought form. The habitual form our thoughts take. In other words the form behind the content. The content continually comes through forms specific to each of us and laid down before language.
Xan: Can you show me this form our thoughts take with no content?
Marcia: I may be just connecting things that don't connect but I was thinking about the core wound and how it might mold our thoughts. No matter what was coming in or going out would be molded by these forms. In the Gurdjieff work it is called chief feature. The central axis around which our personality rotates. Like is sieve with holes structured a certain way.
Xan: Yes, the ongoing impact of core wound/chief feature. I've also heard it called the core belief and the personal law. Does that exist without thought?
Marcia: I am not saying I think this is true but that might be an example of a thought form. That belief behind individual thoughts gives shape to the resulting thought.
Xan: Is there belief without thought?
Marcia: This is how I look at it. Thought is structured by words or has it's basis in language. At least ordinary or one-centered thought. Our beliefs we got before language and they form our thoughts. Or are the forms through which the energy of our existence take form in thoughts. Our beliefs are unexamined. Thoughts we introspect all the time.
In myself, for example, I might have all sorts of thoughts about how someone doesn't like me or even the dog may not like me for some reason. Behind that is the sense that if I do not approach someone in the right way then he/she will not like me. But behind that is a belief that somehow I am worthless and that I have to earn love. So I spend my life taking care of everyone never examining the motivating belief that shapes all my thoughts that I am somehow worthless and unworthy of being loved.
Now don't get me wrong. Taking care of people and nurturing is great if the focus is not on me, me, me trying to fill this "worthless hole" in my psyche. My greatest weakness is also my greatest strength and the behavior may not externally change much at all.
Xan: So you are saying, Marcia, that belief is thought at an unconscious level of mind?
Unconscious as well as conscious mind functions as sounds and words, images and body sensations. Even as pre-verbal memory, a sense of worthlessness is an evaluation, an interpretation, an identity. These are thoughts, are they not?
Gene: I have discovered that the information which remains with us, as the result of wounding (most especially when we are children) is indeed in the forms that Xan and Marcia point out; sounds, words, images, and body sensations. However (and this is a big however!), this residual information of wound, is stored in a _compressed format_.
Non-wound information is stored in uncompressed format; we have the ability to easily access and endlessly ruminate this non-compressed information. Most of what is shared here, is in non-compressed format.
It is useful to know something about data-compression; the easiest examples to know, are the common data-compression formats used to convert large files into smaller files, for transmission over electronic networks, like the internet.
Filenames which have the suffix of [.zip, .tar] for PCs, or [.sit, .bin, .hqx] for Mac, indicate that such files are compressed; they have been rendered into smaller size by the rearranging of certain bits of data. Such files can be uploaded/downloaded much faster than their uncompressed versions. Each file must be uncompressed before it can be used; but sometimes, such files are made simply for the reason that they take up less disk space than their uncompressed versions.
* IDENTITY THREATENED BY INFORMATION
Psyche reacts by stuffing (archiving) information which threatens identity.
The chief characteristic of these stuffed archives of wound-data, is that *although* they are available for our access, they 'play back' at such a tremendous speed, that they are literally incomprehensible to the conscious mind. As they play back in us (usually experienced as an undesired event in itself), the speed of the playback induces a physical vertigo; this is often experienced as a 'veritable blow' to oneself.
* "FLASHBACKS" PLAGUE USERS OF DISINHIBITING DRUGS
Exposure to this instant/incomprehensible information _again_ threatens identity; shockingly instantaneous feelings of _depersonalization_ occur, along with a cascade of emotions and the concurrent physiological flooding of the brain with the neurohormonal byproducts of psychological association.
During high-speed playback, compressed data-files deposit or inject certain _subliminal_ cues; these cues prompt emotional reaction of _desire_ and _aversion_. Although the specifics of the information of wound are still unseen, the consequence of triggering the instant yet incomprehensible playback of this compressed data, may be experienced as _violence_.
The skilled psychotherapist can actuate the 'algorithm of decompression', to allow the real-time playback of the information of wound. A human system which is capable of compressing and archiving information, is also capable of uncompressing that information. Uncompressed, the information of wound is available for real-time rumination.
* ORIGINAL WOUND-INFORMATION "IN-FORMS" WAY OF BEING
Yet, it remains unaccessible to the conscious mind. Searching the memory for significant points of attachment may trigger high-speed playback; the vertigo, the 'blow' to oneself, and the concurrent feelings of aversion and desire, serve as a punishing conditioning to keep us OUT of our own information-archives.
Although the information of wound is indeed composed of the same comprehensible 'thought-forms' as any other datum of thought, it is 'a lot in a small space'; it is kept compressed and in pressurized format. Consider that this entire post could be reduced to the size of a single period (.), but also that considerable energy would have to be continually expended to keep it compressed.
* COMPRESSED 'ISSUES' GOBBLE LIBIDO, DIMINISH IMMUNITY
The energy required to keep information hidden from ourselves, is subtracted form the pool of energy available for us. This effect is noticed as fatigue and diminished immunity; the other more obvious effect is that of being 'on-edge', irritable, and defensive.
* WHAT IS REPRESSED, IS PROJECTED
The unconscious activity of repression (compressing unwanted data) creates pressure which results in the spontaneous and automatic phenomenon of _projection_. In this way, we surround ourselves with a 'virtual reality field' of our own making; it is composed of the very factors which we least want to confront. Fear, resentment and blame are the most common reactions to our own projections. It is very common for a person to see themselves as perpetually suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, while the entire time remaining unaware that they are interacting with a reality of their own making.
* ALGORITHM OF NONDUALITY, SELF-INQUIRY, DESIGNED TO MAKE ALL DATA ACCESSIBLE
It is possible to _learn_ to allow the uncompression of repressed information of wound; it is possible to adopt the practice of _abiding_ the storm of effects which occur during this decompression process. It is possible to learn to let go of the reactions of aversion and desire which inevitably are triggered during either high-speed or real-time playback of memory-contents; it is possible to categorize every reaction as either aversion or desire, and thus to become aware of _attachment_ as it exists as a primary mechanism of the human Being.
'Attachment to outcome' is what underlies every strategy; to let go of attachment to outcome, allows the falling away of strategizing as a way of Being. Releasing strategy sets us up to free-fall into Self, with no 'escape route' or 'back door' retained 'just in case'. This _radical_ release of attachment is without penalty, yet, it is the most difficult of all acts to perform. To perform this act, requires practice of abiding, carried out as a 'walking meditation' 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. It is when we finally realize that our reality is our own, that we are able to own our reality; it is at this point, that resentment, blame, and revenge lose their powerful grip on our selves.
* YOU ARE THE ONLY REALITY; YOU CREATE THE APPARENT UNIVERSE
There is only SELF; there is nothing to contrast with Self. Therefore, there is nothing for Self to be 'like'; thus, Self is 'like nothing'.
* IDENTITY IS ONLY A VERSION OF SELF
All versions of self are Self. Self has the power to forget about Self, and to remember Self. Identity is a defacto hypostasis, a crystalization of information, a hardness comprised of compressed nuggets of wound-information. Reaction is to projected contents of memory. All of what is known, is what has been known. All of what is known, is not Self, it is a version of Self known as identity. All of what can be known, is Self, but Self masquerades as the Unknown, and the future is the unknown; thus, we are "all going to meet ourselves" as Self 'in the future'. Anticipating this event, which is felt to to be release from suffering, we are impatient and thus do not abide. Nonabiding Beings do not abide Beings abiding...
Summary: Compressed information of wound, informs, guides and shapes our world; the violent flashback-effect of high-speed playback of compressed data, calls for that data to be uncompressed and experienced in real-time. Avoidance of unwanted information is the primary strategy which supports the continuance of identity. To abide, is to slow the playback of compressed data, and to tolerate the effects of our own attachments as they are activated as either aversion or desire.
* ABIDING, EQUANIMITY KEY FEATURES OF MATURITY, SUCCESS
Upon the dawning of the realization that we create our own reality, the fight comes to an end. Projections are withdrawn, and resentment is no longer used as fuel for action. We acquire a deep understanding of our own nature, and see that compassion is the highest power; we appreciate that we are designed in such a way as to punish ourselves for nonabiding, and that the key to abiding is compassion for oneself.
* EQUANIMITY EQUALS EQUAL ANIMITY (MOVEMENT) IN ALL SITUATIONS
Life is momentum and momentum is movement. As long as we live, we move. As long as we live, we will either be reacting to our unwanted/projected 'contents', or we will be in understanding of our human nature, and abiding it in all of its complexity and simplicity. Such abiding of oneself, is compassion for oneself. Compassion can inform the inevitable movement of life.
March 8 & 9
Collapsing the Dualistic
Paradigm
by Bruce Morgen
(Selections from 'Words of Wisdom')
The past is dead, the future is imaginary, the one and only abode of the truly sacred is the eternal now moment. The recurring cry of the charlatan and the hoodwinked is "wait and see."
The fact is that the future is intrinsically unknown, and it is the nature of thought to attempt to predict it -- but what does thought have to work with in its attempt to forecast the coming years, months, days, hours, or even minutes? The answer is that thought can only imagine the future from knowledge, which is information acquired in the past, and therefore, in the words of the sentencing jurist, "dead, dead, dead."
Thought, manifesting as ego, is a survival tool by nature and thus fears its own extinction. Because the future is inherently unknown, the thought-full consciousness cannot face that which contains the very real possiblity of that dreaded ego-death. It marshals all its resources, comprising knowledge, and replaces the fearful unknown with the resulting concocted "future."
Thus does ego imagine its way into the illusion of psychological security, and in the process preclude the exclusively in-the-moment advent of the truly sacred, which theists call "God." That is also why people like Benjamin Creme, who encourage future-fixated consciousness aka "wishful thinking," are, by their actions and announced intentions, clearly opposed to the living, actual "God!"
*****
Into meditative silence, there is an indescribable occurence, a movement that is nonetheless utter stillness. It is revelation, it is utterly transformational and not of thought or of the senses. All we can do is muster all our commitment, our personal integrity, our sincerity, and invest it in silent perceptual clarity. The rest is out of human control, a matter of grace, the mystery of what you call "Holy Spirit" and I call "the truly sacred." It is done, but human intention is not the doer.
*****
Feeling "I am" is itself a spontaneous occurrence, any accompanying behavior may therefore also appear to be spontaneous, that is, without detectable cause or motive.
The action of "I am" is intrinsic to state and circumstance, it is choiceless -- a kiss or a kick, at love's behest! The washing of feet, the overturning of tables -- love, all of it....
*****
There are times, beloved companion, that I see violence as a cruel, serrated blade driven though the heart of our species, century after century, by the ambitions of (wo)men bereft of love. This violence is more than war and the shed blood of armed combatants, it is also in the "non-violent" politics of "economic" sanctions that starve and sicken innocents for the transgressions of the tyrants who rule them, and in the fear of ordinary folk who never know where or when a terrorist "martyr" will strike, armed with Torah or Koran verses assuring the righteousness of the murderous deed. Bodhisattva can only weep.
*****
"Christ" is an anglicized variant of a Greek word with the literal meaning of "anointed." It originated as the closest koine approximation for the Hebrew term "moshiach" -- the promised Messiah of Old Testament prophecy, the "anointed of G-d."
As often happens when ones modus operandi is experiential rather than formally philosophical or religious, "The Christ" has taken on a different meaning and function here. "The Christ" is really a perceptual mode that encompasses the collapse of the dualistic paradigm, it is Ruben Feldman's "unitary perception," J. Krishnamurti's "great meditation," Saumen Sengupta's "what is," the in-the-moment revelation that theistic language diminishes to "G-d," it is rightful embodiment of the truly sacred -- it is bodhisattva. It is emphatically not a particular human being, dead or otherwise, but rather an "anointing" that is the birthright and original state of human consciousness.
It is also a symbol worthy of shattering -- and that shattering is also "The Christ," in action rather than as static symbol. So, let us by all means kick the symbolic Christ off the shelf and sweep up what shards remain -- the actual, historical Jesus would surely have done the same. In that shattering moment, let there be the actual Christ, the great revelational perceptual unity that renders all symbols and images moot, spent catalysts at best.
The anointer and the anointed are surely one, and let no (wo)man put asunder! Amen.
*****
Ultimately, the only truly indispensible yoga and "path" is life itself, which I suppose is karma yoga whether we call it that or not.
a name="10">March
11
Mexico City
Blues
by Jack Kerouac
Selections courtesy of John Metzger and Allspirit
111th Chorus
I didnt attain nothin
When I attained Highest
Perfect
Wisdom
Known in Sanskrit as
Anuttara Samyak Sambodhi
I attained absolutely nothing,
Nothing came over me,
nothing was realizable---
In dropping all false conceptions
of anything at all
I even dropped my conception
of highest old wisdom
And turned to the world,
a Buddha inside,
And said nothing.
People ask me questions
about tomatos robbing the vine
and rotting on the vine
and I had no idea
what I was thinking about
and abided
in blank ecstasy
66th Chorus
Dharma law
Say
All things is made
of the same thing
which is a nothing
All nothings are the same
as somethings
the somethings
are no-nothings,
equally blank
Blank
bright
is the whole scene
when you let your eyes
wander beyond the mules
and the fields and carpets
and bottles on the floor
and clean mahogany radios,
dont be afraid
the raid hasnt started
panic you not
day the better
arriveth soon
And the gist of it Nothing-ness
SUCH-NESS
Jack Kerouac, Mexico City Blues
March
15
Forecast of
a Rebellioin
by W. David Kubiak
(from the Orthodoctor web page)
Although you who know in your heart that Aryans, high
priests or Japanese bureaucrats are intrinsically
superior beings should be following the argument quite
readily now, some innocents may still be wondering,
"But why all the goddam secrecy?" Fair
question, fast answer: without historical exception,
orthodoxies exist solely to enforce and embody egregious
inequalities. The social bodies they in-form are always
vertically aligned - whether by caste, race, class or
corporate ranking - with all those beneath the noble brow
inescapably working more, owning little, deciding less,
and being steeply looked down upon to boot. Since
exploited inferiors regularly outnumber their exploiters
by at least a factor of ten, the path to the top is
always a perilous ascent which would-be head-men must
scale with great force or stealth.
You could, theoretically, confect an egalitarian
orthodoxy, but where is the profit in that? If no
disproportionate benefits accrued to the founders, who
would really bother? To bring such a bootless faith to
fruition, you would have to defeat or defang every
headquartered hierarch in the neighborhood. Given the
fierce habituation of this crowd to their glitter, gold
and skyscrapered grandeur, this is a messy prospect at
best. Merely facing off against all the individual
colonels, CEOs and bureaucrat clergy of the land would
scare the equalitarian shit out of most Ghandian
goo-goos, let alone confronting the corporate ferocity of
their collective rile.
In fact, upon contemplation, it appears so self-evident
that challenging the corporate crew's invulnerable power
today would be so clearly, plainly and obviously futile,
that we may justifiably suspect we are caught up in some
vast translucent orthodoxy ourselves. For even if we do
not personally inhabit either a major corporate org or
recognizable hierarchy, we all still abide in a
psycho-social environment that has for many intensive
generations been cultured from Big Bodies, by Big Bodies,
and for Big Bodies. And that ubiquitous miasma just has
to affect our air, not to mention taste and vision. But
if Big Body orthodoxy is so universal - especially in all
the offices and appliances we consult for aid, info and
entertainment - from what remove can we begin to observe
it? Where do the fish go to view their water?
Here we should all genuflect and raise rowdy hallelujahs
for macho Russo-Yankee missile envy and the graphic
largesse of NASA. Even more than the great boons of Tang,
Teflon and turkey in a toothpaste tube, their radiant
astro-snaps of the home planet have elevated human
prospects beyond belief. This potent imagery of the Earth
now invites each of us to imaginatively evacuate the
corporate premises and re-view our reality from a truly
discerning height. And it is from such intuitive
altitudes, that we descry our next great open secret:
Orthodoxies are Alive.
"If the co-operation of some thousands of millions
of cells in our brain can produce our consciousness, a
true singularity, the idea becomes vastly more plausible
that the co-operation of humanity, or some sections of
it, may determine what Comte calls a 'Great Being'."
J.B.S. Haldane
As intimated above, an orthodoxy is not merely a static
assortment of canons, codes and myths of regulation. It
is above all a vital morphogenetic force field that
aligns and synchronizes our beings within a hierarchical
Greater Whole. Over time, these Wholes become tightly
integrated entities bonded with common symbols, customs,
language, etc. But the key adhesive is attention.
Ultimately, it matters little how unified your values,
myths or goals if your members don't pay any attention to
them. Rapt attention, whether elicited with fear, love or
fascination, is thus the vital precursor of all social
synchronization and the life
force that in-forms, nourishes and animates all corporate
bodies.
(Just think how important it is on the human level. Loss
of attention entails loss of allegiance, affection, even
courteous regard. Fewer people look up to you, look to
you, even look at you. This can seriously debilitate an
otherwise healthy person, and is absolute murder for
hierarchs and Big Bodies.)
Whether we're talking Islam, Communism or Coca
Colonialism, orthodoxies all enlarge the same way - by
attracting, capturing and if necessary riveting the
attention of new humans until they are obediently
incorporated within the psychic membranes of the group.
(True, methods do differ. Some capture their attendance
with the sword, others with siren song, and still others
with addictive sweets, but the finally effected
Collective Beings are all huge, hierarchical and
ambitiously the same.)
From our orbital vantage, we can look down upon the
planet's history and observe quite clearly how orthodox
bodies arise from natural hopes and fears, engulf
millions and spread their sway across all the lands of
the world.
For more, please visit: http://www.nancho.net/memes/orthodoc.html
thanks to Gene Poole for recommending this website
March
17
The
Experience of No-Self: A Contemplative Journey
by Bernadette Roberts
(An outline of the first two chapters)
Chapter 1
Roberts describes a quality of silence she had known on
occasions, which was so total as to evoke fear,
annihilation, point of no return. Always she would return
to her usual self, warding off the fear through willful
thoughts of God, thus breaking the silence.
One day, however, that silence could not be broken, for
the fear did not come. And so there was no reason to
return to the relationship between self and God.
Roberts simply remained in that great silence.
For 8 days the silence rendered her almost unable to
function. There were moments of exhaustion and near
black-out. Every chore had to be done with great
attention to every detail.
By the 9th day, Boberts was able to function as usual,
but she noticed a part of her mind had closed down. She
had become emptied of the past and come to live in the
present moment.
Trying to understand that silence, Roberts first
perceived it to be a kind of absorption into God. Then,
after a month, she revised her peception to be one of
"seeing", a kind of opening-up, not a closing
down.
She soon discarded that perception and decided to
research the works of John of the Cross. There she found
nothing describing her experience.
Coming home that day from the library, Roberts turned her
gaze inward and saw there was no longer a center, no
longer a self. There was emptiness. She felt great joy
and lightness with this knowledge. She decided that this
emptiness and joy was Christ. She could live forever with
that. However, further annihilation was in the cards.
Chapter 2
After a while, the joy of the emptiness began to wane and
Roberts sought to rejuvenate it by spending time alone,
simply gazing into the emptiness, which she was still
sure was God.
On one such occasion, the emptiness expanded rapidly and
every sense of life became drained from her. The
realization that came was: "When there is no
personal self, there is also no personal God."
This marked the end of an interior spiritual life, as
well as any other kind of life. Roberts felt now that she
was on an unknown path, lifeless, yet she recognized life
all around her. She intensely felt the need to be in
nature, as life at home was too routine and lifeless.
Though she found herself in the midst of life during her
time of the day she spent in nature, she still had to
deal with an intense emptiness.
In a matter of days another realization arrived, a new
way of perceiving reality: "God of life was not IN
anything, it was just the reverse: everything was IN
God."
At this point, Roberts comments on the limitations of
language: "One thing is for sure: as long as we are
caught up in words, definitions, and all that the mind
wants to cling to, we can never see how it works. And
until we can go beyond our notions regarding the true
nature of life we will never realize how totally secure
we really are and how all the fighting for individual
survival and self-security is a waste of energy."
Roberts further comments on insights gained. She says
insights or realizations are often polluted by being
brought to personal experience, conditionings, ideas, and
to frames of reference.
The secret to allowing an insight to become a permanent
perspective, she offers, is to not touch it or thing
about it, but to flow with it. Once an insight is
released from a frame of reference (and, most especially,
from the frame of reference that it must be released from
the frame of reference), the insight or realization is
free to become permanent.
About two weeks following the insight that everything is
in God, Roberts perception of the world changed. She now
could see the Oneness of everthing and could no longer
see the separateness or individuality of things, only
"THAT into which all separateness dissolves."
Having now transcended the personal and impersonal
relationship with God, Roberts could say, "In truth
then, God is neither personal nor impersonal, neither
within nor without, but everywhere in general and nowhere
in particular. Simply put: God is all that truly exists
-- all, of course, but the self."
In the next chapter Roberts faces the duality of seeing
Oneness and Oneness itself. In other words, she does not
stop at any insight. Her journey keeps taking her to,
through, and beyond the core of any new realization.
The entire book is outlined here