Click here to go to the next issue.

Tuesday, April 3


TERRY MURPHY VIA GENE POOLE

Comments, in the context of the recent letter from TerryM,
without any quotes, just this...

Plug this into the conversation, as background:

~ Once one finds ones integrity, one is allowed only to speak
truth.

~ Truth involves less specifics, than staying with (honoring)
the context.

~ The context of self in integrity is essentially the only
context, in the context of questions about self, truth, and
integrity.

~ Back to the first point; those who have not found their
integrity, reveal themselves, by speaking non sequiturs,
meaning; words out of context.

~ Finding ones integrity, results in a tight (transparent)
phase-lock with space, itself. Essentially, the only words
allowed, are those which naturally emanate from space, not
those which emanate from personality/identity. Straying from
the context, results in actual pain; this is understood, and
is why Buddha spoke only in context, and thus became a living
representative of the context. Natually, his teachings were
designed to lead to a tight phase-lock with space itself;
integrity banishes pain.

~ Seeing this (obvious) relationship between space itself, and
identity, one may proceed to allow only emanation of space to
be uttered; if this is done, it is the end of identity as a
ruling force. This applies to what occurs within, and also to
what occurs without. Essentially, finding ones integrity,
conveys immunity to identity, both ones own, and that of
others.

~ "Devotion" may be understood as continually honoring of the
context.

~ "Really letting go" allows space to become the ruling factor,
and thus the primary context; because space is in the
foreground, it is the primary context, and thus, its concerns
are voiced, or also, its context is inserted into all other
contexts. This is 'continually honoring the context'.

~ It is seen that everything is happening in space, but that
humans pay attention primarily to what happens in space,
rather than to space itself. It is seen, that all forms are
actually information, and that the common confusions of the
human, result from attachments and aversions (values added) to
information.

~ If values are stripped from information, the actual and
intricate interrelationship of all things becomes very
apparent; it is apparent that humans, while immersed in a vast
and powerful field of information, prefer to both censor and
embellish, rather than to simply receive.

Question: If space could talk, what would it say?

CHRISTIANA

(culled facets)
~ Finding ones integrity, results in a tight (transparent)
phase-lock with space, itself.

~ "Really letting go" allows space to become the ruling factor,
and thus the primary context; because space is in the
foreground ...

~ "Devotion" may be understood as continually honoring of the
context.

~ It is seen that everything is happening in space,

... It is seen, that all forms are actually information,

~ If values are stripped from information, the actual and
intricate interrelationship of all things becomes very
apparent

... Buddha spoke only in context, and thus became a living
representative of the context. Naturally, his teachings were
designed to lead to a tight phase-lock with space itself;
integrity banishes pain.

...o0o...

a perfect circling in space


_____________________________________________________________

OMKARA

"It can be said 'I Am The Supreme', but this is as close as can
be gotten in words, and is not really true. The Supreme cannot
even be Subjectiveness, because Beingness or I AM involves the
duality of consciousness and unconsciousness. Beyond
consciousness, not a word can be said, including 'Beingness' or
'I Am'. Consciousness, like the illusion of personality, is also
an illusion, and therefore a burden. Beyond consciousness,
beyond unconsciousness, the Supreme Is, but nothing can be said.
It is not a subject or an object, it neither is nor is not. One
cannot be it or not be it."

________________________________________________________________

ERIC

Mark, maybe everyone i was intending that hurried hello to,
understood the references relating back when i was here last, or
maybe not. It appears that whether i write clearly, or in
semi-private riddles, as i had mentioned about Jerry's comments
to me - no one seems to understand any of my words. I don't
think that the words are meant for understanding. Others here do
that quite well already.

We all communicate so differently. Have you noticed?
Fortunately, there is this place called NDS.

Like the mark and mira poem (which is exactly what i was
intending would bubble out...) we all offer Love here, the
"doing" in a no-doing place.

I write from there. I live there. Not up for debate, (but do
what you must :-)

I have come to know the expression 'Huh?' as the lowest uttering
of which a human being is capable. From my personal perceptions,
this was a perfect response to my own utterings. Moooo!

Maybe this will assist:

Kansas City is the heart of america. It is also referred to
locally as 'cow town'. Further, the female bovine is a sacred
animal elsewhere. Further, human 'native' 12 strand DNA, at this
point in 'time' much more closely has come to resemble the 2
strand DNA of cattle. Most people at worst, live lives like
American cattle. Which is not pretty. All things in our language
are quite 'rich' to me. I use them.

"Dance" was one of the themes, it seems, this morning. Does not
shiva, dance? Is space simply music? Words flow, all things - i
do not know.

Every word i offer, fearlessly, uncontrolled, and - taking a
singular exception to Gene Poole here - "clearly
indiscriminatingly", may very well be the manifestation of that
unnamable place which this list, and yes, we human beings
pursue.

And maybe not.

That would be your choice to judge. Or Abide. Or ignore. I am
back at NDS to challenge Dan B., and everyone else...

"run, run, away" was not the only answer.

Nor was Tim's reminder of "kill the Buddha when you meet him on
the path."

I am Pointing at Formless. Being myself. That's all. No
questions, please. Let's just watch what unfolds.

No More, No Less, Thank you Mark for your openness,

Eric

Ps. Thanks whoever for the soaring valentine poem earlier. Funny
to watch god cry in joy :-) We are quite wonderful!

top of page