Click here to go to the next issue
Highlights Home Page | Receive the Nondual Highlights each day
Highlights #1421 Sunday, May 4, 2003 Editor: Gloria
Everything in nature
contains all the power of nature.
Everything is made of one hidden stuff...
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
John Metzger Allspirit
E-courses
Practicing
Spirituality with Nature Writers
Led by Fred & Mary Ann Brussat
Edward Abbey once described his essays as "prose psalms which celebrate the divine beauty of the natural world." Others who write about nature could say the same thing.
Come along with us on a 40-day retreat with some of those who see the divine imprint in trees, rivers, meadows, mountains, deserts; who recognize wild animals, birds, and sea creatures as God's emissaries; who practice their spirituality outdoors.
"Practicing Spirituality with Nature Writers" is the latest in the popular series of e-courses from SpiritualityHealth.com. We will savor the spiritual insights of Annie Dillard, Terry Tempest Williams, Barry Lopez, Gary Snyder, Rick Bass, Wendell Berry, and many others. These poets, essayists, and naturalists tutor us in the spiritual practices of wonder, play, reverence, and attention. The course will begin on June 9 and continue until July 18. You will receive a daily email with a short passage from a nature writer and a related practice suggestion.
http://www.spiritualityhealth.com/newsh/items/ecourse/item_5843.html
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Tom Hickcox Awareness-The Way to Love
And let there be no
purpose in friendship save the deepening of the spirit.
For love that seeks aught but the disclosure of its own mystery
is not love
but a net cast forth: and only the unprofitable is caught.
Kahlil Gibran
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"Like So Much Cave Art"
"It wants to write its own poem,
to be the creator,
and the created,
my heart.
It wants to pluck a quill from the pheasant,
or the swan,
or the eagle,
to dip the tip gently,
softly into our blood,
and to gracefully inscribe its own tales
deep within it's many chambers,
right there on the walls
like so much cave art.
The beautiful drawings it would paint
there inside
amidst the unceasing whooshing,
undeterred by a throbbing pulse.
The heart inscribes its own poems
right there on its walls
inside the chambers
and waits
with
silence,
pulsing,
for the archaeologists to come."
10 December, 2002
joyce (know_mystery)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Viorica Weissman MillionPaths
A European gentleman began in
measured tones and spoke clearly and slowly: Why should
individuals remain caught up in the affairs of
this world and reap troubles as a result?
Should they not be free? If they are in the
spiritual world, they will have greater
freedom.
M . The world is only spiritual.
Since you are identifying yourself with the physical
body, you speak of this world as being
physical and the other world as spiritual.
Whereas, that which is, is only spiritual.
D . Do the disembodied souls, i.e.,
the spirits, have a deeper insight and enjoy greater
freedom?
M . Because you identify yourself
with this body, you speak of the dis- embodied souls as
being spirits. From these limitations, you
talk of their limitations and seek to know
their capacities. Even the disembodied souls
have subtle bodies; otherwise, you would
not say "disembodied souls."
Disembodiment means "divested of this gross body."
Inasmuch as you endow them with individuality
they are centered in their subtle
bodies. Their limitations will be according to
their own state. Just as you feel the
burden of your limitations, they also feel the
burden of their limitations. What I
meant by spirit and spiritual world is the
Absolute Spirit and not relative. If you
realize yourself as a Spirit, you will see
that this world in only spiritual and not
physical.
from : Talks with Ramana Maharshi InnerDirections Publishing , 2000 page 246
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Scott Reeves Awareness-The Way to Love
Lets get back to that marvelous
sentence in the gospel about losing oneself in order to
find oneself. One finds it in most religious literature and
in all religious and spiritual
and mystical literature.
How does one lose oneself? Did you
ever try to lose something? That's right, the harder
you try, the harder it gets. It's when you're not trying
that you lose things. You lose
something when you're not aware. Well, how does one die to
oneself? We're talking
about death now, we're not talking about suicide. We're not
told to kill the self, but to
die. Causing pain to the self, causing suffering to the
self would be self-defeating. It
would be counterproductive. You're never so full of yourself as
when you're in pain.
You're never so centered on yourself as when you're
depressed. You're never so ready
to forget yourself as when you are happy. Happiness
releases you from self. It is
suffering and pain and misery and depression that tie you
to the self. Look how conscious
you are of your tooth when you have a toothache. When you
don't have a toothache,
you're not even aware you have a tooth, or that you have a head,
for that matter, when
you don't have a headache. But it's so different when you
have a splitting headache.
So it's quite false, quite
erroneous, to think that the way to deny the self is to
cause
pain to the self, to go in for abnegation, mortification,
as these were traditionally
understood. To deny the self, to die to it, to lose it, is
to understand its true nature.
When you do that, it will disappear; it will vanish.
Suppose somebody walks into my room
one day. I say, "Come right in. May I know who you
are?" And he says, "I am
Napoleon." And I say, "Not the Napoleon . . .."
And he says, "Precisely. Bonaparte,
Emperor of France." "What do you know!" I
say, even while I'm thinking to myself, "I
better handle this guy with care."
''Sit down, Your Majesty," I
say. He says, "Well, they tell me you're a pretty good
spiritual director. I have a spiritual problem. I'm
anxious, I'm finding it hard to trust in
God. I have my armies in Russia, see, and I'm spending
sleepless nights wondering how
it's going to turn out." So I say, "Well, Your
Majesty, I could certainly prescribe
something for that. What I suggest is that you read chapter
6 of Matthew: "Consider
the lilies of the field . . . they neither toil nor
spin."
By this point I'm wondering who is
crazier, this guy or me. But I go along with this
lunatic. That's what the wise guru does with you in the
beginning. He goes along with you;
he takes your troubles seriously. He'll wipe a tear or two
from your eye. You're crazy,
but you don't know it yet. The time has to come soon when
he'll pull the rug out from
under your feet and tell you, "Get off it, you're not
Napoleon." In those famous
dialogues of St. Catherine of Siena, God is reported to
have said to her, "I am He who
is; you are she who is not." Have you ever experienced
your is-not-ness? In the East we
have an image for this. It is the image of the dancer and
the dance. God is viewed as the
dancer and creation as God's dance. It isn't as if God is
the big dancer and you are the
little dancer. Oh no. You're not a dancer at all. You are
being danced! Did you ever
experience that? So when the man comes to his senses and
realizes that he is not
Napoleon, he does not cease to be. He continues to be, but
he suddenly realizes that he is
something other than what he thought he was.
To lose the self is to suddenly
realize that you are something other than what you
thought you were. You thought you were at the center; now
you experience yourself as
satellite. You thought you were the dancer; you now
experience yourself as the dance.
These are just analogies, images, so you cannot take them
literally. They just give you a
clue, a hint; they're only pointers, don't forget. So you
cannot press them too much.
Don't take them too literally.
Anthony de Mello, SJ
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Terry Murphy SufiMystic
Now that the whales are gone, on my
daily walks I take my dog Lou
down to the ocean to certain little inlets where the turtles hang
out. Turtles, unlike octupi, are protected, and so they
have no particular
reason to hate people. I have had turtles actually swim a
quarter of mile
or so with me, for no better reason (that I could tell) than
liking my
company.
Turtles eat the green stuff that
grows on the rocks in the tidal
zone. Everyone figures that those hard shells are to
protect the turtles
from predators, but having seen those turtles get a good bit of
banging
around by the water on the rocks, I figure they are to protect
them from
that as well.
Of course, scuba-diving is the
easiest way to hang with the turtles,
as they have to make a real effort to get away from you; in those
little
inlets you have a tendency to corner them without even meaning
to. Plus,
they have favorite spots and habitual places that they are
reluctant to
abandon, even for the novelty of a scuba diver.
It is harder to carry on a
conversation (interaction) with a turtle
from the land, but evening is a good time, as they come in at
that hour to
grab a few breaths (whatever predators they do face are further
out to
sea). About once an hour turtles have to surface to
breathe, but they
spend most of their time underwater, much more so than
whales. I can tell
they are aware of me when they come and eyeball me; plus they
come up more
often than necessary. I talk to them, and I'm sure they can
hear me. They
have attitude and personality, as anyone who has kept a turtle
knows. The
younger (smaller) ones are excited, the older ones more
interested in not
disturbing their routine. They are graceful swimmers but
not above getting
absorbed in goggling at a human and getting tossed about by an
unexpected
wave (thank goodness for those hard shells). On occasion I
have seen a
wave go up that you can see through, and a turtle silhouetted
against the
light coming through the wave.
Some local men a few years back
were busted for selling turtle meat
door to door. They had a net whose mesh size was perfect
for catching
turtles, and possessing such a net is a violation of federal
law. I am
happy there is a law against catching turtles. Laws have
been passed to
outlaw "finning" sharks - it has been a common practice
to catch sharks and
cut off their fins and then release them to die a slow
death. Apparently
sharkfins are valued in the East for use in traditional
medicine. Sharks
are long-lived and slow to reproduce.
I wish they would pass a law
against spearing octopus.
I understand hunting, an ecology
has evolved in the american mountain
states that allows for an annual "harvest" of game
animals which are
essentially grown for the purpose, and without such a harvest -
and in the
contrived absence of other predators - the excess animals would
starve. But fishing, besides being cruel compared to a
bullet, is
essentially strip-mining the ocean of edible protein. Our
gross
intererence with the ocean ecology, similar to the destruction of
the
american buffalo in the nineteenth century, is likely to have
profound
effects on a food-chain we only dimly understand, one which may
be more
fragile than we think. As long as the ocean fisheries
aren't regulated,
people will exploit them to the maximum technology allows.
I know this is way off topic so
I'll let it go.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Gill Eardley Allspirit
Whales and redwoods both make us
feel small and I think
that's an important experience for humans to have at the
hands of nature. We need to recognize that we are not the
stars of the show. We're just another pretty face, just one
species among millions more.
~Roger Payne in Talking on the Water
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Sam NDS
Some old Dutch tulips for you guys (and goils). Their Dutch name is Gouwe Ouwe which means golden old ones...just like you...Sam
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
John Logan HarshaSatsangh
I heard a poet on NPR talking about
"unpacking" a work of art,
poetry, prose, music, painting, sculpture. I found it an
interesting
concept. Behind the word is the question: What happens when we go
back and revisit a work of art?
Some works are actually quite superficial and don't merit
revisiting,
but others we go back to again and again and each time new depths
of
meaning and experience are revealed. It is this quality of a work
of
art that the word "unpacking" applies to. A high
quality work has
this quality that it can be "unpacked" to find deeper
and deeper
meaning for the viewer.
I found it interesting enough that I am revisiting many old
friends,
especially poetry and paintings.
Cheerio,
John L.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Tozen TheUnbornMind
When you put your trust in anything
mortal or self-empty indeed you
choose to believe in the corrupted light of spirit.
Remember, there is nothing lasting in mortality, there is only
change
and fallibility.This is why your spirit should strive to know
itself.
To backtrack its own divided light, over the great river of
dispersion known as "amnesia", and simply recall what
its true nature
is, before corruption.
When this happens, trust comes naturally.
In its own true light, spirit cannot find corruption, nothing
divided
that is absolutely real in itself. It can only find peace and
direct
wisdom.
It is a matter of allowing the real looking upon the real. That
is
all. That is the miracle.
Best regards
Tozen
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Alan Row LookforYourself
(A discussion generated by Douglas Harding's article in latest TAT forum)
The May issue of the TAT Forum is now online at www.tatfoundation.org/forum.htm
Douglas's article comparing Ramana Maharshi and Krishnamurti can also be found in Look for Yourself, a splendid collection of essays, published by The Shollond Trust. I read it first quite a time ago and felt that Douglas had been rather unfair to K by the selective quotation of only that side of K which emphasizes the psychological work one needs to do on oneself. He seemed to want to make the point that Ramana could be said to belong to the 'sudden' school and K to the 'gradual'. But it is possible to find plenty of passages from K's talks which emphasize the need to see immediately. There is one very powerful talk of K's, Saanen, July 23rd, 1964, which I read several years before discovering Douglas. I remember the impact it made on me - the feeling of authenticity - and yet the seeming impossibility of doing what he said. The talk contains a few startling statements which would make quite a lot of people I know sit up....''Whatever their origin, all theologies are immature, as are all philosophies''.........''Both the conscious and the unconscious mind are very trivial''. But the main theme is that of 'search'... ''Surely, all search implies a movement from the periphery to the centre, from the circumstances to the cause, from the boundaries to the very origin of existence''... ''Now, is there a coming to the centre immediately, without this endless struggle to reach the centre, and from the centre, flowering?''... ''You must sometimes have asked yourself if there is not a possibility of coming suddenly, unexpectedly, to the original source, the very essence of things, and from there living, functioning, flowering, so that you need never read a single book, study any philosophy, worship any image or saviour, because wherever you look there is that centre from which all action, all love, everything takes place''... ''....you suddenly come upon the well of life, the original spring of all existence, and when once the mind has drunk at that fountain, it has lived and it lives from there forever''... ''I want to find out *immediately* what is true, and not wait a few seconds or until the day after tomorrow. I want to be *there*. I am too impatient to wait. I have no use for time, for achieving something at the end of my life, or after ten thousand lives.......I want to be so awake that when I open my eyes, my heart, my mind, the truth is *there*, and from there to function, to act, to live, to enjoy the beauties of the earth''... Douglas wouldn't quarrel with any of that, would he? But he might say, as I felt, that K does not really *show* one this. And K does seem to make it rather difficult by going on in this vein... ''Then the cloud in the sky, the dust on the road, the flower by the wayside and the whisper of your own thought, are all part of the whole. But that wholeness can only be understood when the positive movement of the mind has completely ceased''... ''So you see for yourself that to come upon the centre, that original source of things, which is the supreme, all movement of the mind must come to an end''... This is where I part company from K. I feel that any positive movement of the mind *is* part of the whole. Evidently K came upon the supreme when all movement of the mind came to an end, but I don't now feel this is necessary. What is necessary is for a particular kind of thought to come to an end - the thought that creates a self-image and holds to it as the central reality. Douglas's way shows this so clearly. Indeed it is true that ''a single showing is worth ten thousand words''. Love to all, Alan
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Chris Cheney LookforYourself
Yes, I think I understand what you
are saying. The thinking part is
also here now, yup. Yip, can't stay in the now, since you are
already
here, now, yup.
Just ARE, yap. Simple, yipe, that's it.
YES! YOU ARE HERE! NOW!
With nothing extra, that's it.
With 'something extra' there is also nothing extra, that is also
it.
THIS is it. (point both ways to See It.)
Just a child's mind. Watch something, only that, but not rigid,
it is
appearing in this IT, which is empty (looking in), full looking
out,
(and they are not served up separately). Fullness and emptiness
not same
or different. All thinking dissolves in perception.
Just See, just Hear. Just attention is necessary, analysis not
really
necessary. Very alive feeling maybe, like little kid. SURPRISE,
SURPRISE, SURPRISE!!! Then time to eat. Taste, touch, hear, feel,
see.
Everything is present! World is wide awake here where you are
what you
are.
All of these, Douglas, Krishnamurti, Christ etc. are pointing to
you,
this here, now no thing everything space. So no thing sharing
everything
happens.
Love,
Chris
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Janet Hierbach LookforYourself
"It matters not Who you love,
Where you love, Why you love, When you love,
Or how you love, It matters only that you love."
-- John Lennon
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~